First-party field notes ·
A finished weekly digest
Separate completed work, open issues and next steps.
Complete teaching outcome + historical prompt check
From notes to a finished outcome
Read the full fictional material, then compare it with the finished deliverable. The labels beside each claim point back to a source line.
Teaching outcome authored with a Codex agent on 2026-10-13. Fictional inputs; both language versions were prepared in this session. This is an authored sample, not a retained AI run transcript. No Claude or LM Studio run, human review, or measured quality improvement is claimed.
· A finished weekly digest
1. Full fictional source notes
[W1] Fictional workshop team: the invitation draft was finished this week. [W2] Room booking is pending confirmation. It is not confirmed as booked. [W3] The registration form is blocked because room capacity is unknown. The form has not been published. [W4] Next week, confirm the room and capacity before publishing the registration form. [W5] No calendar dates, task owners, progress percentages or participant counts were supplied.
2. Instruction used to author this outcome
Use only fictional notes W1–W5 below. Write a finished, short weekly update in English for the coordinator, with four headings: Completed / Pending / Blocked / Next week, and one bullet under each. Cite source IDs. Only the invitation draft is completed. The room remains pending and the form remains blocked and unpublished. Next week is a plan, conditional on room and capacity confirmation. Do not invent owners, calendar dates, percentages or participant counts. Do not send the update. Return the complete update. [W1] Fictional workshop team: the invitation draft was finished this week. [W2] Room booking is pending confirmation. It is not confirmed as booked. [W3] The registration form is blocked because room capacity is unknown. The form has not been published. [W4] Next week, confirm the room and capacity before publishing the registration form. [W5] No calendar dates, task owners, progress percentages or participant counts were supplied.
3. Finished deliverable
## Completed - Invitation draft finished this week. [W1] ## Pending - Room booking awaits confirmation. [W2] ## Blocked - Registration form is blocked by unknown room capacity and has not been published. [W3] ## Next week - Confirm the room and capacity first, then publish the registration form; this is planned work. Owners and calendar dates were not supplied. [W4, W5]
4. Check against the source
These checks explain how to inspect this sample. Source references are an aid, not an automatic factual review of your own output.
- Completed contains only the invitation draft, not the booking or form. [W1]
- The room booking is under Pending without a completion claim. [W2]
- The form is blocked by unknown capacity and remains unpublished. [W3]
- Next week is planned; confirmation comes before publication. [W4]
- No names, calendar dates, progress percentages or participant counts were invented. [W5]
5. Teaching counterexample and repair
Deliberately wrong teaching sample · not a model failure log
## Completed - Invitation finished, room booked and registration form published. ## Next week - Member A will welcome 20 participants on Monday. Progress is 100%.
This deliberately written counterexample reports pending and blocked work as completed (W2–W3), drops the confirmation prerequisite (W4), and invents an owner, day, count and percentage (W5). It is not an observed model failure.
Correction instruction
Check the draft sentence by sentence against W1–W5. Keep only the invitation draft under Completed. Restore Pending for room booking and Blocked for the unpublished form, with unknown capacity as the reason. State next week’s room-and-capacity confirmation before planned publication. Remove Member A, Monday, 20 participants and 100%, which have no source. Return the complete four-section digest with source IDs.
Corrected complete result
Applying the correction to the teaching counterexample restores the complete deliverable below. It matches the source-backed sample above.
## Completed - Invitation draft finished this week. [W1] ## Pending - Room booking awaits confirmation. [W2] ## Blocked - Registration form is blocked by unknown room capacity and has not been published. [W3] ## Next week - Confirm the room and capacity first, then publish the registration form; this is planned work. Owners and calendar dates were not supplied. [W4, W5]
The existing starter uses shorter fictional notes. Replace them with your own non-sensitive material, generate an instruction in your chosen tool format, and compare its answer with the source.
Earlier local prompt-generation check · 2026-10-07
The record below checks only the helper’s instruction generation. It is separate from the Codex-assisted teaching outcome above and contains no external AI task result.
What changed in the instruction
This compares structure, not the quality of an AI answer. More fields do not guarantee a better result.
Original requestWrite a weekly update from these notes.
| Refined fields | Short direct request | Helper instruction |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Supplied | Supplied |
| Materials | Missing | Supplied |
| Constraints | Missing | Supplied |
| Output format | Missing | Supplied |
| Acceptance criteria | Missing | Supplied |
Historical technical evidence
Sign in for historical reproduction evidence
Historical reproduction records and raw evidence downloads require an active account. New worked teaching examples, their checks and sample downloads stay open without registration.
What still needs a person
Compare each statement with the notes, especially words such as completed and planned. A generated instruction has not written the digest.
We did not send these instructions to Claude, Codex or LM Studio. We did not evaluate completed meeting notes, recommendations or digests. Automated hints cannot verify facts or guarantee safe output.